I stuck my neck out last year, and he came SO close. This year I'm going to stick my neck out again and say that Lewis Hamilton will go one better and take the title. With driving like we saw at the German Grand Prix last week, it's mind-boggling to think that he is only halfway through his second year in F1!
I just HAD to throw this one in - it's priceless! (Not that I'm anti-seatbelts, airbags, etc. and I'm not overly keen on smoking or blowing up frogs - just in case any Mother Grundys think I'm being TOO serious about this...)
Congratulations to those who were born before 1980
First, we survived being born to mothers who smoked and/or drank while they carried us and lived in houses made of asbestos. They took aspirin, ate blue cheese, raw egg products, loads of bacon and processed meat, tuna from a can, and didn't get tested for diabetes or cervical cancer.
Then after that trauma, our baby cribs were covered with bright colored lead-based paints.
We had no childproof lids on medicine bottles, doors or cabinets and when we rode our bikes, we had no helmets or shoes, not to mention, the risks we took hitchhiking!!! As children, we would ride in cars with no seat belts or air bags. Riding in the back of a Bakkie on a warm day was always a special treat.
We drank water from the garden hose and NOT from a bottle. Take-away food was limited to fish and chips, no pizza shops, McDonalds, KFC, Steers, Nandos. Even though all the shops closed at 6.00pm and didn't open on the weekends, somehow we didn't starve to death!
We shared one soft drink with four friends, from one bottle and NO ONE actually died from this. We could collect old drink bottles and cash them in at the corner store and buy Chappies, Wilson 's Toffees, Wicks Bubble Gum and some crackers to blow up frogs with.
We ate cupcakes, white bread and real butter and drank soft drinks with sugar in it, but we weren't overweight because ... WE WERE ALWAYS OUTSIDE PLAYING!! We would leave home in the morning and play all day, as long as we were back when the streetlights came on. No one was able to reach us all day. And we were O.K.
We would spend hours building our go-carts out of scraps and then ride down the hill, only to find out we forgot the brakes. We built tree houses and cubby houses and played in river beds with matchbox cars.
We did not have Playstations, Nintendo's, X-boxes, no video games at all, no 99 channels on DSTV, no video tape movies, no surround sound, no mobile phones, no personal computers (and no Apple Macs, Dion!), no Internet or Internet chat rooms..........WE HAD FRIENDS and we went outside and found them!
We fell out of trees, got cut, broke bones and teeth and there were no Lawsuits from these accidents.
Only girls had pierced ears!
We ate worms and mud pies made from dirt, and the worms did not live in us forever.
You could only buy Easter Eggs and Hot Cross Buns at Easter time.......no really!
We were given pellet guns and catapults for our 10th birthdays!!
We rode bikes or walked to a friend's house and knocked on the door or rang the bell, or just yelled for them!
Mum didn't have to go to work to help dad make ends meet!
RUGBY and CRICKET had tryouts and not everyone made the team. Those who didn't had to learn to deal with disappointment. Imagine that!! Getting into the team was based on MERIT AND NOT DUE TO BLACKMAIL, THREATS AND GUILT FROM THE PAST... strange but true!
Our teachers used to belt us with big sticks and leather straps, and bully's always ruled the playground at school (I hated this part when I was growing up, 'cos I was littler than the other kids).
The idea of a parent bailing us out if we broke the law was unheard of. They actually sided with the law! The parents of the house dished out the punishment to ALL the kids there, whether theirs or not, and if you came home and told your parents that you got a smack, you inevitably got another one!
Our parents didn't invent stupid names for their kids like "Kiora" and "Blade" and "Ridge" and "Vanilla"
This generation has produced some of the best risk-takers, problem solvers and inventors ever! The past 70 years have been an explosion of innovation and new ideas. We had freedom, failure, success and responsibility, and we learned HOW TO DEAL WITH IT ALL!
And YOU are one of them (except you babies born after 1980)! CONGRATULATIONS!
You might want to share this with others who have had the privilege to grow up as kids, before the lawyers and the government regulated our lives for our own good. And while you are at it, forward it to your kids so they will know how brave their parents were.
There is the story of the little girl (let's call her Jenny) who was watching her mother prepare the Sunday roast, in the hope that one day, when Jenny is old enough, she too would have the honour of preparing this venerable family meal.
As Mom was about to place the piece of beef into the roasting tin, she cut a slice off the one side.
Jenny immediately asked, "Mom, why do you do that?" "Because I always do that, sweetie," Mom replied. "But why?" said Jenny. "Because Gran always did that", replied Mom. "But WHY?" Jenny insisted.
Exasperated, Mom told Jenny to go and play with her dolls. But the episode got her thinking about exactly why her own mother cut the slice off the roast. So she 'phoned her mother and asked about this, and the reply was, "Because my mother always cut off the slice".
By now completely exasperated, the mother decided to give her grandmother a ring. Although Jenny's great-grandmother was 90 years old, she was still as sharp as a tack and quite active for her age. So when Jenny's mom asked her grandmother about cutting the slice off the meat, she received, in a somewhat surprised tone of voice, this answer: "Because my roasting dish was too small, dear".
In two of my earliest posts, I questioned some of the things that we do during our worship services, and I must confess that I had not given this too much thought until recently. It was during a baptism orientation class that we were conducting at St Andrews Methodist Church, where we were going through baptism and what its meaning is, that I again thought about some of the things we do as part of our worship - often without thinking and without questioning why some of these things are done.
After all, if you come to think of it, unless you understand what baptism is all about, and its significance in the life of a Christian, sprinkling water on a baby's head is actually quite a dumb thing to do! Why not give the child a proper bath if you want to splash water all over the place?
I'll share some thoughts on baptism in a later post, but right now I have a question that I REALLY need the answer to:
Why do we stand during the reading of the Gospel?
This question gives me sleepless nights - particularly since it is bound to happen that a member of the congregation is someday going to ask me why. And I haven't the foggiest idea!
According to the website of the Missouri Lutheran Church, “the act of standing is a common gesture for showing respect. When someone enters a room, we usually stand to greet that person. If a prominent official makes an appearance, it would be considered rude not to stand out of respect for that person's position. If we were to find ourselves in the presence of royalty, protocol would dictate that we remain standing”.
This is one of the reasons given for why we stand for the Gospel reading.
Another reason given is that “the reading from one of the four Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) occupies a very prominent place in the service, for it either contains the very words of Jesus or proclaims His saving work. Standing for this reading is one, obvious way of greeting our Lord who is present in His holy Word”.
Now I do not wish to sound disrespectful in any way towards a practice of another church, especially since the same practice is fairly widespread in Methodist services as well, but these reasons for standing give me more questions than answers. Consider the following:
- Standing is seen as a sign of respect. I’ll go with that one, since I still hold onto the “old school” value of giving up one’s seat for a lady, and standing when greeting someone or addressing a meeting. But why then do we stand only during the Gospel readings? Are we saying that readings from these four books of Scripture warrant more respect than those from other books? I’m sure that the majority of people would agree that readings from any of the books of the Bible warrant equal respect.
- It may be argued that we also stand during the singing of the Lord’s Prayer and of hymns. While I will not question that these elements of worship need to be respected as well, as a former Welsh Male Voice Choir chorister I always believed that standing is simply the preferred posture for singing, allowing entry of air into the lungs and unrestricted movement of the diaphragm.
- "But we also stand for the prayers over the offering”, one might argue. Personally, I’ve never understood this one, either – is the prayer for money more important than the prayers of adoration, confession, thanksgiving, or intercession?
- It is argued that the Gospels contain “the very words of Jesus”, depicted as such in red lettering in certain editions of the Bible. If that is the case, we should then also stand during any reading from Revelation, since much of Jesus’ direct speech (as depicted in red) also appears there. Yet we tend to remain seated for such passages.
Now don’t get me wrong for raising these questions – I’m by no means trying to raise a doctrinal issue here. In fact, I have no particularly strong feelings either way. I conduct services in congregations where the custom is to stand during the reading from the Gospels, as well as in congregations where this custom is not followed.
And if I am conducting a service in a church for the first time and am unsure of the prevailing custom, I usually announce something along the lines of “We will now read from (whichever Gospel reading I have selected), and those who wish to stand during this reading may feel free to do so”. That way I have not placed anyone under an obligation to stand where the custom is not followed, but at the same time shown respect to those congregations where it is in fact customary to stand.
As indicated waaaaaay back in a previous blog, here is the news from our recent Synod. Because this report was presented to our Circuit Quarterly Meeting last night, there is a fair bit of emphasis on what "our guys" were up to...
We give thanks to God for allowing the members of the South Rand Circuit Quarterly meeting to appoint us as their representatives at this year’s District Synod, and it is with pleasure that we present our report. The purpose of this report is not to provide a “blow-by-blow” account of all the happenings of this year’s Synod, but rather to provide highlights of the main events, items discussed, and resolutions taken.
Opening of Synod The theme of this year’s Synod was “Come, Holy Spirit, heal and transform Your people”, and given the political and social turmoil currently being experienced in Southern Africa, there is no doubt that we need to be transformed by the power of the Holy Spirit into a Church that is both prophetic and hospitable.
In his opening address, Bishop Verryn once again gave thanks to both laity and clergy for the sacrifices that they made in carrying out God’s calling of ministry, especially at a time when people “who are created in the image of God” have been displaced as a result of xenophobic and criminal violence in their communities. He emphasised the fact that “all people have an unalienable, indelible place in God's consciousness.”
Citing a recent occurrence at Central Methodist Mission where a lady gave birth to her child in one of the toilets, Bishop Verryn indicated that just as apartheid sought to divide people based on race, thereby diminishing the worth of those who were not members of the privileged group, so in the New South Africa we continue to use divisive “poisons” such as race, class, country, language, education, etc. with which to measure the value of people. He challenged the Synod that it is the Church’s role to take away this mask of prejudice and hate, and let us see people as in the image of God.
Ordinands and candidates A number of ministers, having completed their studies and probation, were presented before the Synod for final screening and approval as ordinands. These precious brothers and sisters in Christ are to be ordained into the Ministry of Word and Sacraments with the imposition of laying on of hands at the forthcoming Conference.
South Rand Circuit was well represented, with Rev Pumla Mtshiselwa (Mondeor) and Rev Thandeka Dintlhe (Kibler Park) among those to be ordained this year. Rev Kaiser Thibedi (Imvana Trinity) has also completed the second phase of his probation, and his application to advance into Phase 3 (preparation for ordination) was accepted.
At the other end of the journey of training for the ministry, South Rand Circuit was also well represented with two out of the seven candidates for the ministry (Christine Laubscher and Steven Jones) coming from our neck of the woods.
HIV Voluntary Counselling and Testing facility Recognising the scourge of HIV / AIDS in South Africa, a facility whereby Synod delegates could be voluntarily tested was set up. While it would have been hugely symbolic for a large contingent from the Synod to avail themselves of this facility, time unfortunately did not allow for a specific slot to be worked into the Synod programme, with the result that only 15 people came forward to be tested.
Use of languages other than English for Synod business It was recognised by the Synod that many delegates do not speak English as a first language, and felt that the use of other languages would promote inclusivity and engender greater participation in the proceedings. Unfortunately, given the vast amount of business that needs to be concluded during the three days that Synod takes place, use of one common language is necessary.
Synod therefore decided that while the business of Synod would be conducted in English, delegates should feel free to address the Synod in the language of their choice, with interpreters on hand. A number of the delegates did in fact use this opportunity to express themselves in their home languages, resulting in wider participation than in previous years.
Election of District Bishop Elections were conducted for the position of District Bishop, since Bishop Paul Verryn’s third term of office as Bishop expires at the end of 2009. In addition to the incumbent Bishop, there were four nominees for the position. However, as voting was about to commence, Bishop Verryn announced that he would not be making himself available for re-election, which meant that a new Bishop for Central District was guaranteed. Bishop Verryn’s withdrawal from the list of nominees was seen by many as a courageous step, and he was given a standing ovation by the Synod.
The voting was tight, going to a third ballot, but eventually an emotional Rev Peter Witbooi was confirmed as the new Bishop of Central District from 2010.
Rev Witbooi acknowledged his predecessor’s guidance and leadership, and expressed his gratitude to Bishop Verryn for his experience and expertise, from which Rev Witbooi intended to draw extensively. Regarding the direction in which he sees the District taking, his main concerns are the causes and consequences of crime, ethnic and racial intolerance, and the impact of the widening gap between rich and poor on the Church and its ministry.
Election of Presiding Bishop All twelve Districts of the Connexion participated in elections for the Presiding Bishop, as the term of the current incumbent, Bishop Ivan Abrahams, also comes to an end next year. Once the votes from all the Synods were tallied together, Bishop Ivan Abrahams was confirmed as Presiding Bishop for 2010 – 2012.
Report on the Seth Mokitimi Methodist Seminary Project A new Methodist seminary for the training of future ministers is in the process of being established on the University of kwaZulu-Natal’s Pietermaritzburg campus. It is named after the late Rev Seth Mokitimi, who was elected as the first black President of the Methodist Conference in 1964.
Rev Jack Scholtz presented a DVD outlining current developments, including the purchase of land for the seminary as well as accommodation for students and academic staff. Thus far R22.6 million has been spent, with a further R66 million earmarked for the completion of the project (according to the brochure handed out at Synod). Thus far around R35 million has already been raised for the project from donations and other sources, while the sale of Church property under the Jubilee 2008 programme is expected to raise a further R13 million.
While there was a degree of excitement at the establishment of a world-class training facility for future Methodist ministers, concerns were raised regarding the cost thereof – the total of which was reported as R93 million. Ongoing running costs of such a facility are also likely to be substantial, and questions were raised concerning the perceived current lack in the training of Methodist ministers that would necessitate the establishment of such a facility. Given the context of a country ravaged by unemployment, high food and energy prices, HIV / AIDS, and abject poverty, a number of Synod delegates felt that the Church has more pressing priorities.
Ministerial benefit schemes Benefit schemes operated by The Methodist Church of Southern Africa for its clergy came under the spotlight – in particular, the Supernumerary Fund and the medical scheme.
With regard to the Supernumerary Fund (which in lay parlance is the pension fund for clergy), Rev Dimitris Palos led a spirited discussion concerning the use of the actuarial surplus in the fund. He reminded delegates that the Supernumerary Fund was in parlous financial shape some years back, with the result that the ratio of church contributions to that of members was increased from 1: 1, as provided for in the rules of the fund, to 3: 1. Since then, the financial position of the fund has improved significantly as a result of these increased contributions, and it now has a healthy surplus.
As a result of the fund’s healthy financial position, Conference took a decision during 2007 to reduce the Church’s contribution to the Supernumerary Fund back to the statutory 1: 1, and divert the additional contributions into a general fund to be used for other projects. Part of the funding for the new Methodist seminary would come from this fund.
The Synod expressed strong disapproval of this decision, firstly because Districts and Circuits were not consulted prior to this decision being taken by Conference, and secondly because there are issues of justice that need to be addressed. Rev Palos cited an example of one minister with 40 years’ service rendered mainly in an urban context receiving a monthly pension of R6 000, while another minister with similar years of service would receive only R2 000 per month largely due to being placed in rural contexts. This iniquitous disparity is yet another legacy of apartheid, and one that the Church needs to address.
The Synod consequently passed a resolution requiring that the Conference 2007 decision be rescinded; that the Circuit contributions that had already been diverted into the general fund be reinstated to the Supernumerary Fund; and that mechanisms be investigated to redress imbalances in pensions arising from past iniquities.
There was also widespread unhappiness about the Church’s medical scheme that is administered by Pharos. It was pointed out that while the benefits provided by the scheme are reasonably comparable to those provided by other schemes, particularly given the relatively low contributions that ministers are required to make compared to most corporate schemes, the main difficulty arises from the fact that service providers need to be paid up front.
A resolution was therefore passed, requesting the Methodist Connexional Office to investigate the possibility of having the payment mechanism changed to one where the service provider is paid directly by the scheme, and any portion to be contributed by the minister be recovered from their stipends.
Finance District treasurer John Storey presented his financial report for 2007, which included statistics on membership as well as how District finances were spent. He complimented the Circuits on their timeous submission of their 4C and 4S Schedules, with only two Circuits having failed to submit their schedules by Synod (compared to five Circuits last year).
An interesting statistic presented was the average level of giving per member. Based on 65 475 members in the District and total giving of just shy of R90 million, the monthly average was R115. The main financial problem at District level remains the high level of arrears, although the situation has improved when compared to the previous year. The District treasurer expressed his thanks to Brian Hovelmeier who is the District Finance Committee member responsible for chasing up the arrears.
The issue of contributions by organisations to the District budget was discussed, with approximately 10% of the District income to come from this source. This is in recognition of the fact that much of the costs of running the District are incurred on the work of the organisations. While the principle of organisations being assessed was generally accepted, there was resistance from the Women’s Auxiliary, who cited lack of funds for this purpose.
St Stithian’s College The Rector of the College, which has campuses in Randburg and Sandton, presented its annual report for 2007 to the Synod. The ownership of the College vests in a trust created upon its establishment, but there is a strong Methodist presence on both the board of the St Stithian’s Trust and the College Council.
While the College continues to hold its place among the top private schools in the country, concern was once again expressed that such institutions tend to be elitist and the fees charged prove to be a massive barrier to all but the wealthier sections of society.
Retirement of Rev Thenjiwe Mahlakalaka In a moving service on the Saturday evening, the Synod bade farewell to Rev Thenjiwe Mahlakalaka, who served at Central Methodist Mission and goes on retirement at the end of 2008.
As is tradition at such services, the retiring minister places a stole across the shoulders of one of the ordinands, and Rev Pumla Mtshiselwa had the honour of being the receiving ordinand this year.
I can't believe that it is nearly two months since I posted anything on my blog. Things have just been SO hectic lately - a case of "time's fun while you're having flies" (according to frogs), perhaps?
I'm sure that hard-core bloggers will probably believe that if you are too busy to blog, you are too busy - full stop! That is certainly true of the last couple of months. So much has happened - the ministry work in the Glenanda refugee camp, the Circuit six-monthly accounts, the Synod report ... not to mention the "normal" stuff like conducting services, attending meetings, etc.
It's a good thing that my wife has photographs of me sometimes! When people ask her how she'll cope if the Methodist church decides to send me to some far-flung place to start my probation as a minister, her answer will probably be: "Pretty much the same as I do now!"
On the bright side, last weekend my Mom was at a Lay Witness mission, my son was sleeping over at a friend, and Itumeleng had given me the weekend off (my first this year), so Belinda and I were *alone* - wonderful!
There is much for me to catch up on, and little time in which to do it in, but watch this space. As Arnold Schwarzenegger said once, "I'll be baack..."
It may have been the sampling of that pineapple beer in Standard 8 that resulted in me choosing accountancy as my first career (and not touching alcohol since), but a far stronger Spirit has called me into my second career as I prepare for the exciting journey towards becoming a full-time minister in the Methodist Church of Southern Africa.
Being married to my wonderful wife Belinda, and having been blessed with an amazing son, James, is living proof that accountants DO have a personality. (Or maybe Belinda just felt sorry for me, perhaps?)
Judging by the blogs of Dion Forster, Wessel Bentley, and others, it looks like being able to blog is one of the requirements for being a minister (!), so here goes...