God's Word for today

Saturday, 15 January 2011

When (and how) do people come to Jesus?

While attending the funeral of a seminary colleague's mother last week, I got chatting afterwards to one of the members of the local congregation, and the subject got around to the time and circumstances in one's life when one accepts Jesus as Lord.

This raises a number of questions - the first one being the influence of one's surroundings on a decision to come to Christ.  Take ministers, for instance.  Most of the ministers I know grew up in Christian homes, many being "sons / daughters of the manse", which is a churchy term for those whose fathers were ministers.  Note too my use of "father", since most churches did not ordain women until fairly recently (the first in the MCSA being in 1976).

However, my friend Shane, who has been in the ministry for around 12 years, did not grow up with Christian parents, and nor did I.  What's also interesting in our case is that both of us were brought up by our mothers alone (with our parents getting divorced while we were young); both of us became Christians in our late teens; and both of our mothers accepted Christ shortly after our own conversion.

In the absence of a Christian influence in the home, what then brought us to salvation?  In Shane's case, it was the weekly tutelage of a faithful Sunday School teacher (which he attended because all of his friends did), while for me it was the result of a long struggle in coming to understand what the "Duty to God" line of the Scout promise really meant.  As time went by, an overwhelming sense that "being Christian" was far more than mere attendance at church resulted in an eventual encounter with the living Christ.

Contrast this image of our upbringing with the picture in our homes now that we have families of our own.  Shane married a "daughter of the manse" and ministered for a number of years with his father-in-law.  Belinda and I met shortly after we had both accepted Jesus as Lord.  Shane's two children have stood at the front of the church chanting "pwaise the Lord" from the time they began to walk, while our son James does not recall any particular day on which he decided to invite Jesus into his heart since, as he told his tearful parents some five years ago, "Jesus has always been my Lord".

The second question is around the nature of people's conversion experiences.  John Wesley, for instance, speaks of a "heart strangely warmed".  Shane's conversion was a classical "spiritual U-turn", leaving behind a lifestyle of drinking and fast motorcycles to follow Jesus.  Mine was an "intellectual" conversion - a point came in my life when the life and teaching of Jesus was "made sense", and it therefore seemed pointless to any longer resist following Him.  James had no conversion experience at all, since for him there were no "BC days".

What, then, does all this say about people and their relationship with Christ?  Those who subscribe to Calvinist theology would cite the events described in this blog post as evidence of "predestination" - a doctrine that stipulates that God predetermines who will be saved, and who won't be.  Somehow, though, I cannot buy this line of thinking.  Freedom of choice is too large a factor.  Continuing with the parallels between my friend Shane and I, both of us are the most stubborn so-and-so's to walk on God's great earth.  We change when we want to change, not when someone else says we must.  Only if things make sense to us will we go along with things.

I can therefore only deduce that God's infinite wisdom and prevenient grace (now there's a good Wesleyan word for you!) means that not only is each individual presented with an opportunity to accept Jesus as Lord, but that such opportunity is presented to each according to where they are.  So why, then, was Shane, to quote Chris Rea's lyrics, on "The Road To Hell" when he encountered Christ?  Why did it happen to me in the cold, intellectual environment of a university lecture hall?  How is it that James was effectively born saved?  And why did John Wesley spend umpteen years as an Anglican priest and a lecturer in theology before his understanding of who Jesus is moved from his head to his heart?

None of us will ever know the answer.  But just as Jesus called His first disciples from an assortment of different characters, so Jesus continues to call different people in different ways.  For me, this points to two things: Firstly, in the words of John Wesley, "all can be saved".  And secondly, if this is true, the Gospel message cannot be presented in a "one size fits all" package if we are to be truly effective for Christ.

2 comments:

markpenrith said...

:).

Hey Steve,

Cool thoughts.

Two questions, firstly, if "all can be saved" why aren't they? Secondly, what for you is the distinction between packaging and content?

Steven Jones said...

Hi Mark

My apologies for taking so long to reply.

Firstly, to your question "if 'all can be saved', why aren't they?", my understanding is based on our God-given freedom of choice, an example of which is found in Revelation 3: 19-20. We were not created as robots. It is often a source of both wonder and bewilderment that God would allow humankind the freedom to choose, but then again, those God-sourced virtues such as love, kindness, etc. could never be real unless freely expressed.

As to your second question, I understand "content" as being the Gospel message, and "packaging" being the way we present it (often through our churches, but mostly by the way we live). For example, suppose you heard that a particular restaurant served the best food in town. However, when you arrive at the restaurant concerned, you find that the carpets are worn through, the tablecloths are full of cigarette burns, the waiter is rude to you, it takes forever to prepare it, and when the chef comes out with this much-anticipated meal (on chipped plates), he is wearing a greasy overall, his fingernails are dirty, and he has a foul-smelling cigar stuck in the corner of his mouth. Would you want to eat there? I know I wouldn't!

The same goes for the way we as Christians sometimes present Jesus. It's not about whether we worship with hymns or choruses, or whether or not we say the "Our Father" each week. Each to their own, as far as worship styles are concerned, as long as it brings the person concerned closer to Jesus. Rather, it is our empty rituals (whatever form these take, whether traditional or contemporary), "clubs" that pass for churches (where the "insiders" matter and those who are "out" remain outsiders), and less-than-exemplary lifestyles that cause many not to seek out the real Christ.

I'm however open to debate and discussion on these - in fact, I'd welcome it.

Blessings,
Steven